Here are the participants, as well as some commentary:
The Deniers were:
- Michael Crichton
- Richard Lindzen
- Philip Stott
The Fascists were:
- Brenda Ekwurzel
- Gavin Schmidt
- Richard Somerville
Before the debate started the audience's position on Global warming is not a crisis was as follows:
After the debate the audience was polled again, with the following outcome:
How can it be that such a massive swing took place in the space of a couple of hours? If the 'science is settled' then why were the Climate Fascists not only not able to hold their position but actually increase it? And why would Gavin 'the debate is over' Schmidt even agree to a debate in the first place?
I forgot to mention that this debate has not been widely reported in the mainstream media. If the Fascists had won then do you think it wouldn't have been splattered all over the media?