Showing posts with label San Francisco. Show all posts
Showing posts with label San Francisco. Show all posts

Thursday, August 17, 2023

Homelessness in San Francisco

So sayeth Willie Brown:

Still, San Francisco’s homeless advocates believe money is the answer, with organizations coaching new arrivals to say they’re “from San Francisco” while helping them navigate the system. The “nonprofits” themselves complete what has become a billion-dollar industry chasing its own tail, with 59 providers receiving $240.6 million in fiscal year 2019–20, according to the latest audit by the city’s budget and legislative analyst.

When Sidner sat down with former mayor Willie Brown to ask why he believed San Francisco couldn’t make a dent in its catastrophic homeless problem, Brown was succinct: “It is not designed to be solved. It is designed to be perpetuated. It is to treat the problem, not solve it.”

Whether Sidner edited the piece purposefully or not, it was apropos...

Pretty much.

Monday, August 14, 2023

Self-driving Taxis

Now that school's back in session I'm back to listening to "my guys" on the radio on the morning commute, and this morning they were talking about self-driving taxis in San Francisco:

On Thursday, California state regulators voted 3-1 in favor of allowing robotaxi services to begin paid, public 24/7 operations in San Francisco, effective immediately.

Concerns came to my mind instantly, and because great minds think alike, the radio guys made the same points. 

Taking a taxi now might not be horrible, as there's an actual human in the car to curb the passengers' worst excesses.  Without a human, I see such taxis becoming Las Vegas hotel elevators.

Imagine:  it's 2am, the bar's shut down, and two inebriated paramours alight across the street and into the nearest self-driving taxi.  Question:  would you want to be the next passenger in that taxi?  Ew.

Imagine: it's 2am, the bar's shut down, and a lone individual hops in one of those self-driving taxis.  Unlike so many other people in The City he/she chose not to pee on the sidewalk, but during his ride realizes that he/she will not make it home in time.  Question:  would you want to be the next passenger in that taxi?  Ew.

Those are the first two things that came to my mind, and given that we're talking about San Francisco here, are they at all unlikely?  Tell me you can't imagine them happening...

It's not the technology that concerns me, it's the humans.

Saturday, July 22, 2023

Pictures of Places

click to embiggen the pictures

San Francisco:



The Farallons:



I'd heard that these islands existed, but I'd never seen them before July 10th--and probably never will again.

Juneau, AK:




Skagway, AK



Icy Strait Point:



Tracy Arm and the glacier:



Prince Rupert, BC:



And my final view of San Francisco and the ship as we crossed the SF Bay Bridge on the way home:

Thursday, July 20, 2023

Leaving San Francisco

After hearing, then watching the remainder of, a smash-and-grab in San Francisco, maybe leaving was a good idea even if I didn't have this view of the City and the bridge:


I took video going under the Golden Gate Bridge but it's over 300 MB so I can't post it yet....

Update:  Try this link for video :-)

The Plan Is To Be Home Tonight

The hint I gave:  Carnival Miracle.

I first saw this ship on my cruise to Alaska in 2014:

I took this picture in Skagway.

Two years later, I sailed on Carnival Miracle on a Mexican Riviera cruise:

I took this picture in Cabo San Lucas.

Assuming all has gone to plan, I boarded Carnival Miracle and left the Port of San Francisco on July 10th and sailed up to Alaska; as of the time I've scheduled this to post, we should be docking back in SF.

I will endeavor to post some trip pictures soon.  (Remember, I'm typing this before the cruise) I hope to get some "postable" video sailing under the Golden Gate Bridge.

Sunday, July 09, 2023

Stuck In San Francisco For 3(?) Days

Have you heard about the cruise ship that was damaged when it slammed into the dock in San Francisco on Thursday?  It was supposed to depart that afternoon for a 10-day cruise to Alaska, but was not allowed by the Coast Guard to leave the port because of damage it sustained.  Here's the latest from KTVU in Oakland:

The Ruby Princess cruise ship docked at Pier 27 in San Francisco is ready to set sail with 579 fewer passengers.

The cruise line announced the ship will set sea at 2:30 p.m. Sunday for a 7-day Alaska voyage after getting the green light from the United States Coast Guard. The repairs were reported complete and it passed inspection and certification.

Originally there were 3,256 passengers going on the cruise, but the cruise line said there are now 2,677 guests on the ship. The crew number remained the same at 1,161.

Guests had the option to cancel their cruise with a 100% refund, and also receive a 50% credit for a future trip. Passengers who chose to continue their trip on the Ruby Princess will receive a 75% refund, and a 75% credit for a future voyage.

The ship had smacked into the pier Thursday morning causing a gash in its underside. Crews worked throughout the weekend to repair the hole ahead of Sunday's departure.

The ship will stop in Ketchikan on July 12 and Prince Rupert on July 13, returning to San Francisco on July 16.

It was originally scheduled for a 10-day voyage, but that was cut short due to the damage.

The cause of the initial crash remains under investigation by the U.S. Coast Guard.

You don't often think that something like that would happen in the United States, but it did. The ship is scheduled to leave port in less than 20 minutes as I type this; if you're interested in keeping track of its location I found this web site.

BTW, I'd totally take the 75% refund and a 75% credit on a future cruise.  Why would you get off the ship and go home a week early?

Update:  It left later than 2:30, but it's on its way.

Thursday, March 30, 2023

The End Result of "Equity"

There's no moral or educational justification for keeping students from accelerating in math and achieving.  SF's  shibboleth of "equity" is nothing more than kneecapping high achieving students rather than raising up the bottom students, and at least the authors of this column recognize that:

All parents want opportunities for their children to excel academically. However, reaching the top in math at San Francisco Unified School District, is like climbing a cactus tree. It’s going to hurt.

At SFUSD, a math curriculum limiting student advancement currently exists; especially hindering socio-economically disadvantaged students from advancing in math. This is counter to what parents expect from a school district.

In 2014, SFUSD denied access to algebra 1 for all eighth graders, regardless of their preparation and motivation, justifying this with the word “equity.” SFUSD subsequently claimed success, but inquiring community members were denied access to supporting data. Obtaining data through public records requests, the district’s success claims were exposed to be grossly misrepresented.

SFUSD claimed algebra 1 repeat rates were reduced, but this occurred by removing a post-course test requirement. SFUSD claimed an increased enrollment in advanced classes, but this occurred by calling a class “advanced” that was not. A lack of transparency, and manipulating data to justify policies, demonstrates how SFUSD operates.

The benefits of eighth-grade algebra 1 are clearly explained in an open letter signed by nearly 1,800 science, technology, engineering and math professionals. This course initiates a five-year pathway to STEM readiness culminating in AP calculus in 12th grade.

In practice, SFUSD’s delay of algebra 1 has created a nightmare of workarounds...

When parents have to "work around" the roadblocks put up by the school district, something is wrong.   Read the whole thing.

Tuesday, December 20, 2022

Sic Semper Thieves

I still believe in West Point's honor code regarding lying, cheating, and stealing.  All three are equally bad, but I think stealing is more equal than the others.  The guy who made this video doesn't like stealing much:


He might be my new hero.

Thursday, October 20, 2022

It's Fun Wasting Other People's Money

How could anyone have thought this was acceptable?

Local officials were set to gather on Wednesday in San Francisco's Noe Valley Town Square to celebrate their latest win: a single public toilet that will cost as much as $1.7 million to build and won't be completed until 2025. 

But the celebration was canceled after a San Francisco Chronicle columnist highlighted the "mind-boggling" and "maddening" details of the project. 

California Assemblyman Matt Haney told the newspaper that he now considers the price tag "inexplicable."

As the saying goes, sunlight is the best disinfectant.

Thursday, September 22, 2022

Inadvertently Revealing "An Inconvenient Truth"

Aren't they admitting that black and brown people are often the thieves?

San Francisco crime has skyrocketed since 2020 and bike theft has grown into an epidemic in the Golden City. In response the San Francisco Bike Coalition wrote on their "considerations" section of their website that victims of bike theft should reconsider calling the police as "Black and brown" people could be harmed from the interaction.

Why do you want to protect thieves merely because of their skin color?  They’re freakin’ thieves, they should be busted.

The San Francisco Bike Coalition minds are so open their brains are falling out.

Monday, September 05, 2022

The Golden State Today

When I was growing up, I thought of California as some sort of beacon to the world.  There was nothing that couldn't be accomplished in this state.  Now we can't even keep the lights on, according to this email I received today from my electric company:






As an extreme and unprecedented heat wave deepens, SMUD and all grid operators across the state are using every available means to avoid rotating outages in the early evening hours. SMUD asks customers to limit their use of electricity from 4 p.m. to 9 p.m. This aligns with Governor Newsom’s state of emergency order and the California Independent System Operator’s extended series of Flex alerts.











Power_Alert_Icon_Yellow











The #1 way to conserve energy is to set your thermostat to 80oF or higher.











Residential customers can help by raising thermostat settings on air conditioners to 80oF, limiting the use of major appliances and turning off unnecessary lights.

Commercial and industrial customers can reduce the use of lighting not essential for safety purposes in garages, hallways, lobbies, warehouses and displays. The minimized use of office equipment, supply and exhaust fans, circulating pumps and maintenance and repair equipment will also allow us to lower demand for electricity.

We'll exhaust every avenue before rotating outages are called. This includes procuring power on the open market, activating our voluntary Air Conditioning Load Management program and calling on commercial customers who have previously agreed to reduce consumption. 

Should rotating outages become necessary, impacted customers will be given as much advance notice as possible, and no customer will be out of power for more than approximately one hour. We'd rotate outages by sections until the emergency is over. No section will be repeated until all 39 sections have been cycled through. You can learn which section you're in at smud.org/RotatingOutage.
















Find your rotating outage section










How are those wind turbines and solar panels doing?  Why do we only have one nuclear power plant left in the state, and the governor had to sign legislation to prolong its life?  Why do we have to import so much of our electricity into this Democratic People's Republik?

Are other one-party states run this poorly?  Remember that the governor was mayor of a city that has its own online map of where there's human poop on the streets and sidewalks.  There's an app for that, too.  I'm quite serious in asking this:  is there any part of California's government that's well run?

Fast becoming a Third World hellhole.

Thursday, June 23, 2022

San Francisco Backs Down

Lowell High School used to be the jewel in SF's educational crown.  It also previously used merit for admissions.  Then came the 'rona, and the school board killed the goose that laid those gold star eggs and changed the admissions policy to a lottery--you know, for diversity and anti-racism.  That hasn't worked well, and they've had a change of heart:

The San Francisco school board voted 4-3 Wednesday night to return Lowell High School to a merit-based admissions system, two years after it first switched to a lottery-based system.

Beginning with freshman entering in fall 2023, test scores and grades will be used to admit students to Lowell, barring any other changes by the board, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

The board first voted in favor of a switch to the lottery system in October 2020 because they said remote learning created a lack of academic data on which to base admissions decisions.

Four months later, the board made the decision to permanently switch to a lottery system in an effort to address alleged racism and a lack of diversity at the elite academic school. That vote faced a legal challenge, which ended in a judge ruling that the district had violated laws related to the Brown Act that regulate public meetings. 

The board reversed the decision to permanently instate lottery-based admissions and then extended the lottery process for another year.

I guess this means the SF school board is for racism and against diversity, right?  I mean, what other explanation could there be?

Wednesday, June 15, 2022

A Nice Couple Days

A friend from work and his wife took their trailer, and I took my trailer, to Point Reyes for a couple days just to decompress now that school is out.  Here are some pictures:

click to enlarge

 

 The Marin Headlands, future home of Starfleet Headquarters


San Francisco from the Marin Headlands (the north side of the Golden Gate)


Elk on Point Reyes


A long stretch of beach on Point Reyes

 

We stayed at Olema Campground, which was very nice (big spaces) and probably the quietest campground at which I've ever stayed.

Monday, May 30, 2022

Firearms

When Darrell Brooks drove his SUV through a crowd at a Christmas parade in Waukesha, WI, last November, killing six and injuring 62, no one called for banning SUVs.  When Osama bin Laden and his gang flew airplanes into buildings over 20 years ago, no one called for banning airplanes.  We're coming up on the 100th anniversary of the worst school massacre in US history, and it wasn't perpetrated using firearms.

It's common knowledge that firearms were much more prevalent at schools 50 years ago then they are today.  Heck, I have a friend who took his rifle to high school for marksmanship instruction in PE class.  Schools in hunting areas had parking lots full of vehicles with full gun racks.

"Yes, but..." is what the lefties will say, then their words will dissolve into emotional goo.  "If it saves just one life", they'll say, despite the fact that we can rattle off hundreds of unpalatable things that will save more lives than we lose at schools, where the chances of a child's being killed is still on the order of being struck by lightning.  Seeing that argument fail, they'll switch to, "Law enforcement is trained to...", despite watching law enforcement sit around on their hands (sometimes under orders, sometimes out of fear) in Parkland, in Uvalde, in the George Floyd riots, and despite the fact that it was the left that wanted to "defund the police" less than 2 years ago.  Getting more anxious and less reasonable, they'll try to argue the "well-regulated militia" clause of the 2nd Amendment, interpretations of which can reasonably be argued by both sides.  At this point they'll scream that firearms supporters are just white supremacist Trump supporters who don't deserve to live, ignoring that the origins of gun control laws were attempts to disarm black Americans so they could not defend themselves; I doubt all supporters of firearms are Trump supporters.

Do you notice how every time, every. single. time. there's a mass shooting, lefties almost salivate with the anticipation that the shooter is a white male Republican NRA member?  And every single time when it isn't, they instantly change their narrative, and somehow white male Republican NRA members are at fault?  I meet three out of four of those criteria, and the left's lies tick me off.

I wasn't always such a strong supporter of an individual right to own firearms.  Thirty years ago I had drunk the gun control kool-aid.  I believed that government was best suited to keep order, and that individuals owning firearms were a risk that could reasonably be controlled.  Heck, Communism ended without a shot being fired!  Then came the Rodney King riots, and the video of Reginald Denny.  Then came Bosnia.  And the dominoes started falling.  

I guess I should thank America's left for demonstrating the true wisdom of the Founders.  It was their own words, actions, and hypocricies that caused me to change my views.

Two quotes come to mind, the second because of the first:

“Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.”     Daniel Webster


"I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery."     Rousseau

I don't want to get rid of the firearms, I want to get rid of the people who use them to commit atrocities.  But lefties don't want that, they want to release accused criminals without bail and, in cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco, not even to try accused criminals.  I do not understand such a warped mindset.

Update:  I find this to be true:

But it’s easier to focus on firearms than it is to talk about the other cultural factors at play, which we tend to avoid because they reveal difficult truths about our society and the ways in which it has failed.

Monday, February 07, 2022

The Difference Between A Liberal And A Conservative

Regarding government programs, conservatives look at results whereas liberals consider only intentions--and in this case, people die:

San Francisco launched a “bizarre medical experiment” in which the city helps the homeless use illegal drugs. Environmental and urbanization writer Michael Shellenberger notes that since the pandemic began, the city has lost twice as many residents to drug overdoses than to COVID.

“The city is carrying out a bizarre medical experiment whereby addicts are given everything they need to maintain their addiction — cash, hot meals, shelter — in exchange for . . . almost nothing,” Shellenberger reports in a Substack column...

Despite promises in January from “progressive” Mayor London Breed to “put an end to all the bullshit destroying our city,” her own government is running “a supervised drug consumption site in United Nations Plaza"...

Someone with “firsthand knowledge” of what’s going on at Linkage texted Shellenberger to describe the scene: “What’s happening is that everyone that comes in gets a meal, can use the bathroom, gets drug supplies (needles, foil, pipes), and signs up for a ‘housing assessment.’ But there’s no housing. So nothing happens. They just get added to a list.”

The city is handing out everything but the drugs themselves.

Support people's drug habits and you'll get plenty of people to do drugs.  How anyone could think otherwise amazes me, but I don't think like a leftie.

You owe it to yourself to read the whole thing--because crazy ideas don't stay confined to the Democratic People's Republik of Kalifornia.

Thursday, January 27, 2022

Must Be All Those Republicans/White Supremacists In San Francisco

The article states that there were 8 "anti-AAPI" hate crimes reported in SF in 2019, 9 in 2020, and 60 in 2021.  The SF police chief said that one man was believed to be responsible for fully half of the 2021 numbers.

Oddly enough, the article didn't answer the most obvious question.  For lefties, race/ethnicity is everything, so...what racial group is most at fault for these crimes?  My guess, after a few decades of paying attention to the leftie media:  if they didn't tell you it was white people, then it wasn't white people.

Sunday, December 05, 2021

In A Sane World, Such A Place Would Be Shunned Out Of Business

San Francisco, however, is the very opposite of a "sane world":

The co-owner of a San Francisco restaurant defended refusing service to three uniformed police officers following backlash over the move, calling the establishment a "safe space." 

"It's not about the fact that we are anti-police," chef and co-owner of Hilda and Jesse, Rachel Sillcocks, told ABC7 News. "It is about the fact that we do not allow weapons in our restaurant. We were uncomfortable, and we asked them to leave. It has nothing to do that they were officers. It has everything to do that they were carrying guns."

So much naivete--or is it stupidity--in 4 short sentences. 

Update, 12/6/21:  They've apologized--because of the bad press they're getting--but they'd do it again

The owners of a San Francisco restaurant are now apologizing after denying service to three uniformed police officers who were on-duty.

Hilda and Jesse initially denied service to the three San Francisco Police Department officers on Friday after they were seated at the restaurant. 

According to ABC7 News, one of the owners said that the on-duty police officers' "presence" made staff at the restaurant feel "uncomfortable."

"It's not about the fact that we are anti-police," co-owner of Hilda and Jesse, Rachel Sillcocks said. "It is about the fact that we do not allow weapons in our restaurant. We were uncomfortable, and we asked them to leave. It has nothing to do that they were officers. It has everything to do that they were carrying guns."

According to Sillcocks, the officers are welcome to come back and dine in the restaurant but without their weapons...

The co-owners continued, stating that they hope the incident will be a "teachable moment" but stopped short of saying whether on-duty officers are welcome in the establishment.

Sunday, August 22, 2021

Success In High School Math

At about the same time as San Francisco, my own school district switched from allowing students to accelerate in math as fast as they could to requiring almost every 8th grader to take "8th grade math" and every 9th grader to take "Integrated Math 1".  Here are the San Francisco results:

SFUSD does not provide grade distribution over time for higher level courses, and offers just numbers about course-takers, without breaking out the course grades, so we cannot make any definitive statement on those. Yet some hints are available from what SFUSD does provide.

Advanced Placement (AP) math course enrollment in SFUSD has stayed mostly constant, at 1,600–1,700 tests taken every year. Yet prior to the new program AP Calculus made about 70% of the tests taken with the other ~30% being AP Statistics, but under the new program the AP Calculus enrollment dropped to less than 60% while AP Statistics rose to over 40%. SFUSD administrators will tell you that “statistics today is more important than calculus” yet that is not what professors at leading colleges and STEM faculties are saying. AP Calculus is more demanding, as can be clearly seen from SFUSD’s own math “pathways” that allow taking AP Statistics under its regular pathway, but doesn’t allow for AP Calculus unless one takes a compressed (accelerated) pathway.

In other words, since the program change more students take the easier statistics and fewer take the more demanding calculus as their culminating high school math course. SFUSD does not provide a breakdown of student score on the AP exams so it is impossible to judge whether the scores on them have improved or deteriorated since the program change.

Finally, the only objective measure we have of the SFUSD new math program boils down to the state-wide Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) testing. Grade 3–8 SBAC tests do not include any significant algebra, so the only real way to assess SFUSD success is the 11th grade math test (which is not very demanding to begin with). Here the story is telling.

Read the whole thing.

Why do so many people who are responsible for the education of children do so much to inhibit the education of children?