Wednesday, November 19, 2014

The Shirtstorm

I've stayed mostly out of the Shirtstorm discussion until I could find something to quote with which I could agree, and this is it:
The European Space Agency made history when their Philae lander touched down onto a comet. This was a major accomplishment, not just for science, but for humanity. The comet, 67P, is only 2.5 miles wide and can travel tens of thousands of miles per hour.


But unfortunately — albeit also unsurprisingly — feminazis cared not a whit about what an incredible achievement this was, and zeroed in on one thing: the shirt that Dr. Matt Taylor was wearing in an interview:
matt taylor
The shirt is clearly famous women in science fiction, such as the 50 Foot Tall Woman and Wonder Woman — and was made for Taylor by a female friend of his. But because the shirt had women sort of scantily clad, it was apparently unacceptable — and the Atlantic writer Rose Eveleth kicked off the feminazi mob...

The femisogynists talk constantly about how women are so interested in science, technology, and engineering, but when there is a major, groundbreaking story involving those exact subjects, the only thing they can do is whine about how a shirt hurt their feelings...

A woman that actually was strong and empowered wouldn’t act like a Victorian-era woman fainting because they saw too much skin somewhere. And they’re hypocrites about it too, considering that they organize Slutwalks and encourage women to dress as skankily as possible — but heaven forbid a man wear a shirt that they don’t approve of...

It almost makes me embarrassed to be a woman — but then I remember that only about a third of all American women identify with these raving lunatics, and I feel so much better. No wonder they have to invent reasons to be offended. It must be hard to realize that you’re utterly irrelevant. 
I admit it, I disagree with the last sentence.  One-third of American women agree with these harpies?  That's not an insignificant fraction at all, so they're not irrelevant.  The fact that they could ruin the celebration of a recent major scientific success shows they're not irrelevant.  Disgusting and clueless, yes, but not yet irrelevant.

8 comments:

maxutils said...

I would totally wear that shirt (but you already knew that) and anyone who was offended could bite me. I mean really … it's a shirt. I think suit/tie looks stupid, but if you want to go with mainstream society, be my guest.

David Foster said...

If anyone seriously thinks that a woman is more likely to encounter dubious/crude images and behavior in science & engineering than in many, many other career fields...say, commercial real-estate sales or administrative work in a law firm...then they haven't been around much.

Anonymous said...

Have you ever seen a "feminist" who is attractive? Like finding a unicorn.

allen (in Michigan) said...

Back in the day there was Gloria Steinem who was hot enough to get hired as a Playboy Bunny.

No, it's not ugliness on the outside that marks radical feminists but ugliness on the inside.

PeggyU said...

Only about a third? Only??? That seems an excessive amount to me!

PeggyU said...

Allen - Ugliness on the inside eventually seeps out I think.

Anonymous said...

You DO realize that the guy who wore the shirt apologized--emotionally--for his error in judgment.

HE realizes his mistake. You champion it as a cause celeb. Very telling, indeed.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/video/2014/nov/14/rosetta-scientist-matt-taylor-breaks-down-apology-offensive-shirt-video

Darren said...

Yes, he did apologize. Wrongly, in my opinion, as he did nothing wrong. Lots of people apologize for wrongs they aren't guilty of. The women who made his accomplishment all about clothing are the ones who screwed up.