Sunday, October 16, 2005

Math Humor

Great link with some hilarious jokes. OK, they're only hilarious if you're into math, otherwise you won't get them.

And all us math geeks will laugh at you. And at the jokes.

But, first, the SandySmithDisclaimer:

WARNING WARNING WARNING! Some of the jokes at this link contain sexual innuendo and may get your mommie's panties in a wad if she catches you reading them.

And now, the link you've all been waiting for....


Amerloc said...

Hope you don't mind that an English teacher found the word-play funny as well...

OK - maybe I cheated by knowing enough math to recognize some of the terms.

Anonymous said...

"Some of the jokes at this link contain sexual innuendo and may get your mommie's panties in a wad if she catches you reading them."

And some of the jokes are totally racist.

With humor like this, is it really any wonder why Darren is divorced and no longer in the Army?

Darren said...

1. Apparently more than mommies get their panties in a bunch.
2. I'm not divorced. Never have been.
3. I haven't been in the Army in 15 years.
4. What's your point?
5. Get a life.

Anonymous said...

I knew Darren when he was in the Army and we had dinner the night he decided to leave the service. And a bottle or two of alcohol... He decided he didn't want to be in the service anymore. Both his battery and battalion commander strongly wanted to keep him in.

To paraphrase the great Dan Ackroid, "Anonymous, you ignorant slut!"

Anonymous said...

2 weeks ago he went on a rant about Family Court.

Darren had a child out of wedlock? Good for her. :0)

Darren said...

See what happens when you assume, Anonymous?

Only you didn't make an ass out of me.

Anonymous said...

"Johnny has an AK-47 with a 30 round clip. If he misses 6 out of 10 shots, and shoots 18 times at each drive-by shooting, how many drive-by shootings can he attempt before having to reload?"

I like this one, because really, missing 6 out of 10 shots has nothing to do with the problem. It's just a distraction, and perhaps a comment on the bad aim of these gangsta have.

Darren said...

An AK-47 was designed to put a large number of bullets downrange very quickly. It was not designed to be a pinpoint weapon as much as it was to put lots of steel into some area. As such, 6 out of 10 wouldn't be bad.

M-16's, on the other hand, while they *can* fire in fully automatic mode, *are* pinpoint weapons. Not so hard to knock down a 300m target with an M-16. I did it many times. :-)

Darren said...

Guess I should read the problem. Said he *misses* 6 in 10. Still, my point remains.

And getting 4/10 while moving and shooting probably fully automatic? Not bad.

Darren said...

A *rant* about Family Court? I mentioned it in this post:
Reasonable minds can decide if this post constitutes a rant about family court.

Kate said...

Darren, regarding the math humor; It reminds me of something my husband once heard an instructor say at a math class at West Point (My husband was class of 80). He said the instructor had this big long proof up on the board, said a few words about the first part of it and ended with the words "the rest is of course, intuitively obvious to the casual observer".

Darren said...

I learned that saying as "intuitively obvious to the most casual observer." Close enough for me to say, "some things never change!"