Thursday, September 02, 2021

Why Credibility Is So Important

So many of our formerly-trusted institutions have lost their credibility in recent years, and we see the results all around us.  In addition to government, the fields of science in general and medicine in particular have taken pretty strong hits:

Is science itself one of the victims of the COVID-19 pandemic? I asked Dr. Scott Atlas at the 13th annual Freedom Conference hosted by the Steamboat Institute, a Colorado-based nonprofit organization. Formerly a professor and chief of neuroradiology at Stanford University Medical Center, Atlas is now a senior fellow in health policy at the Hoover Institution.

Atlas has been under constant attacks by the left and the corporate media since he served as a special adviser to former President Trump and a member of the White House coronavirus task force from August to November 2020. The New York Times and the Washington Post ran hit pieces on Atlas, questioning his qualifications despite his distinguished career and scholarship.

Google-owned YouTube also removed a 50-minute video of Atlas’s interview with the Hoover Institute. Twitter took down his tweet that questioned the effectiveness of masks.

Atlas has refused to be silenced. He has a lot to say about how the scientific field and Americans’ trust in it have been tremendously harmed during the COVID-19 pandemic. “Science has been not just a victim,” he told me, “but actively participated in the self-destruction of its credibility.”

This part struck home with me:

“Science is not supposed to be about intimidating, countering interpretation of data, or abusing, or censoring data,” Atlas said. “Science is not supposed to have a view. Science is only about data and the scientific process. There is never supposed to be ‘an accepted view’ of science.”

Yeah, what he said.  Read the whole thing.

4 comments:

PeggyU said...

Not just reading it, stealing it. Thanks!

Anonymous said...

Oh man, that's a good one. I almost thought this was a real doctor until I saw his name. Surely you know the expression about quacks?

Anna A said...

Yes, and when a person that you are trying to share a report (Israeli about natural immunity being better than vaccine immunity) is more concerned about the links instead of the data.

Sigh

Darren said...

Regarding Anonymous' comment: this we call an "ad hominem attack", a fallacy.
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/logic_in_argumentative_writing/fallacies.html