If math is haaaaaard for you, maybe you don't want to read
this:
When discussing climate with people who do not have technical
backgrounds, I have learned much of the climate discussion is a foreign
language to them.
Phrases like “Dalton minimum” or “Atlantic multidecadal oscillation”
make their eyes glaze over. Once, after I explained what causes wind,
the reply was, “my head hurts.” So, I no longer try to explain
atmospheric science. Besides, I am an engineer, not a meteorologist. I
have had better luck by sharing simple examples that let people reach
conclusions on their own about human versus natural influence. Telling
them I can show them the math if they want to see it adds credibility,
because few, if any, alarmist publications intended for the general
public include any math to support their claims. Describing the energies
that drive weather, and therefore climate, is a good way to do this.
So, I take them through a few examples of how much energy is involved
and how miniscule human activity is by comparison. Done properly, this
lets a non-STEM person grasp the huge amounts of energy involved...
These types of examples are good for communicating with nontechnical
people. They let people relate atmospheric physics to their own life
experience and everyday understanding of the world in which they live —
even if that understanding might be skewed or incomplete.
Then follows some math and science that most people
should be able to follow. Here's the conclusion:
I know, I know. This is a very simplistic analysis that ignores the
complexities of actual heat transfer. But that’s the point; non-STEM
people can follow it if they know a little math.
And yes, the alarmists would argue human emissions are indirectly
causing heat to transfer to Antarctica, and this type of analysis is
therefore irrelevant. So what? They must show how human emissions
transfer that heat, and how much heat is being transferred.
My goal here is to show the enormous energy levels involved and how
ridiculous it is to blame humans for any significant ice melt. That’s my
hypothesis; let the alarmists come up with the null.
And they can start acting like they believe their own doomsday scenarios, too. If they did that, at least I'd be able to have some respect for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment