San Francisco's ever-active Animal Control and Welfare Commission has renewed its push for a pet sale ban in the city - only this time, it even covers goldfish.
How can anyone want a government that would tell them they can't own a goldfish?
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
"How can anyone want a government that would tell them they can't own a goldfish?"
The people who want this ban do not want to own goldfish themselves. They want to prevent *OTHER* people from purchasing goldfish.
Here's a theory, but I think I can get a grant to prove it. The amount of drugs that have been shed through urine into the watershed of the area has create layer upon layer of chemical mood and intellect altering substances that have seriously impacted the acuity of most people who live in the region. My fallback theory is an adult version of "shaken baby syndrome" using the fault lines as the source of derangement.
2 comments:
"How can anyone want a government that would tell them they can't own a goldfish?"
The people who want this ban do not want to own goldfish themselves. They want to prevent *OTHER* people from purchasing goldfish.
Totally different.
-Mark Roulo
Here's a theory, but I think I can get a grant to prove it. The amount of drugs that have been shed through urine into the watershed of the area has create layer upon layer of chemical mood and intellect altering substances that have seriously impacted the acuity of most people who live in the region. My fallback theory is an adult version of "shaken baby syndrome" using the fault lines as the source of derangement.
Post a Comment