Monday, March 12, 2007

Separation of Church and State-funded Schools

OK, lefties, get ready. We're invoking God to get more money for schools!

"It will be Armageddon, but we are on the side of the Lord and we will prevail!"


So which right-wing religious zealot said this? Rod Blagojevich, Democrat governor of Illinois.

Where's the outcry from the atheist crowd? Where's the outcry from the lefties? If a Republican had said this, the ACLU would be wetting their pants in excitement and anticipation of a lawsuit while the other lefties would be foaming at the mouth.

Hat tip to NewsAlert (see blogroll at left).

Some of the Interesting People Who Read This Blog

Joanne Jacobs (see blogroll at left) warned me that stat counters are addictive, and for me at least, she couldn't be more right! I get some of the coolest information from that counter, including the searches people used to find my site and the locations of viewers. I was pretty impressed with the information in the following screen dump:



Additionally, I periodically get hits from a korea.army.mil domain, meaning at least one of our soldiers in Korea sometimes takes a peek here. I've also had a hit from the California State Senate and one from the Whole Foods domain (amazingly enough, reading a post in which I mentioned Whole Foods). I have a fan in Reston, VA, who comes here daily, and once in awhile I get a reader in a place near and dear to my heart, Port Angeles, WA. I've also been able to identify some of my regular readers in Sacramento, Hawaii, the Air Force Academy, and Texas.

Once in awhile I get hits from Britain and Australia, but they don't seem to stay long. Probably not a lot to interest them, what with my US politics and US education focus. I don't want to take anything away from my compatriots in the Anglosphere, though--please keep coming back!

I think I spend too much time checking the stat counter. I'll cut down.

Starting next week =)

Update, 3/13/07: This morning I found a reader from the US Department of Education. Welcome!

Sunday, March 11, 2007

Taliban Tae-bo

I'm tired of being fat, but here's one workout regimen that I will not be following.

Hat tip to Little Green Footballs (see blogroll at left).

Gardner's Multiple Intelligences

Every teacher in the country, at least those who got their training in the 90s and beyond, learned about Gardner and his theory of multiple intelligences. Following this link will take you to a brilliant Hoover Institute essay on the topic, one that casts some doubt on Gardner's theory.

One may wonder how educators got so confused by Gardner’s theory. Why do they believe that intelligences are interchangeable or that all intelligences should be taught? The answer is traceable to the same thing that made the theory so successful: the naming of various abilities as intelligences.

Why, indeed, are we referring to musical, athletic, and interpersonal skills as intelligences?


Why indeed? After all, the essay concludes:

In the end, Gardner’s theory is simply not all that helpful. For scientists, the theory of the mind is almost certainly incorrect. For educators, the daring applications forwarded by others in Gardner’s name (and of which he apparently disapproves) are unlikely to help students. Gardner’s applications are relatively uncontroversial, although hard data on their effects are lacking. The fact that the theory is an inaccurate description of the mind makes it likely that the more closely an application draws on the theory, the less likely the application is to be effective. All in all, educators would likely do well to turn their time and attention elsewhere.


There's no good way to learn trigonometry except to do trigonometry. To try to teach it emphasizing each of the eight so-called intelligences would be a disservice to the student.

What Does This Mean?

One of the google searches that brings people to my site was "Micah was arrested for", which takes readers to this post. I've seen one other blogger mention this same search, and it shows up a few times a day. Does anyone know what it means?

Friday, March 09, 2007

San Francisco State University Is A Disgrace--Or Worse

Today College Republicans go on trial at San Francisco State for stepping on flag pictures to show their rejection of terrorism.


Joanne's got more information here. I won't comment further, as that school is beneath contempt. I would have nothing but bile and vitriol to say.

Update, 3/10/07: Apparently, I'm not the only one with bile and vitriol. One professor believes that every Zionist--not terrorist, not criminal, but Zionist (however you want to define that)--should have a bullet in his head. Is it any wonder the SFSU College Republicans are on "trial" for merely walking on a Hezbollah flag that they themselves brought to a rally?

Tax Credits and Math and Science Teachers

There's always talk about recruiting more such teachers, and here's what Governor Schwarzenegger wants:

The governor says the state could save $165 million a year by eliminating the state's teacher tax credit, which is supposed to provide an incentive for experienced educators to stay on the job while reimbursing them for some of the money they spend out-of-pocket on classroom supplies.

The credit starts at $250 for teachers with four years' experience and goes to a maximum of $1,500 for those with 20 years' experience...

The governor's argument comes at a time when many education advocates say more needs to be done to recruit and retain talented educators.

Sen. Jack Scott and former astronaut Sally Ride held a press conference at the state Capitol on Wednesday to highlight the need for more skilled math and science teachers. And according to the California Federation of Teachers, only about half of new teachers stay in the job for more than five years.


Unfortunately, that 50% figure has been debunked so many times that the CFT loses credibility by quoting it.

But let's talk about this teacher credit. While I don't mind the opportunity to keep more of my own money in my own pocket, I'm sympathetic to these points:

In a recent analysis, the Legislature's nonpartisan budget adviser said the tax credit has cost the state about $500 million since it began in 2000, with little clear data showing an effect on teacher retention.

For one thing, the tax credit has been in effect for only three of the past seven years. During the other years, it was suspended to help close multibillion-dollar budget gaps during the state's fiscal crisis.

The legislative analyst reviewed the data and found that about 200,000 teachers took advantage of the credit in the years it was available. Almost 90 percent of those who claimed the credit had incomes over $50,000. There were not fewer teachers quitting or retiring in years when the credit was available...

"There is no question that teaching is a noble and valued profession, but should teachers receive a tax credit whereas other valued workers in our society do not?"


So we have this lengthy story about math and science teachers, and all I can find in it is this debate over the teacher tax credit. Oh, here are two sentences:

Sen. Jack Scott and former astronaut Sally Ride held a press conference at the state Capitol on Wednesday to highlight the need for more skilled math and science teachers.

A package of bills Scott announced Wednesday would offer small subsidies to help science and math professionals make the transition to the classroom and help teachers prepare to obtain science and math teaching credentials.


I believe the article in the major Sacramento paper was misnamed.

The Left Isn't Serious About Energy Independence

If Bush can enrage environmentalists by developing the ethanol they once championed, it is unlikely that any alternative (in the hands of Bush, that is) will satisfy them. They simply aren't serious.


link

Thursday, March 08, 2007

The Searches That Bring People To This Blog

I have to wonder what the person who employed this search was really looking for. It's a search that brought a reader to this blog.

Do you sense a bias from that person?

Canadian Teachers Unions Are As Leftie/Nuts As American Teachers Unions

Read what the Education Intelligence Agency (see blogroll at left) has to report about proposals before the British Columbian teachers union at its annual convention. One of my favorites:

* Another resolution calls on the union to give $5,000 to support American soldiers seeking asylum in Canada.

A Leftie View of NCLB

I have a colleague whom I respect tremendously, but has one of those irrational beliefs that drives me nuts.

She's absolutely convinced that the purpose of the No Child Left Behind Act is to destroy public education. From what I can follow of her reasoning, the fact that by 2014 all schools have to have 100% of students at grade level (as determined by standards and standardized tests), or else "the state takes over", is the foundation of her belief.

She cannot answer the following questions, which shed some doubt on her belief.

1. How do you account for the fact that California's testing regime not only predates NCLB, but is more stringent than NCLB?

2. How do you account for the fact that our current testing regime was put in place by a Democrat governor and a Democrat-controlled legislature?

3. Why would Ten Kennedy, one of the official authors/sponsors of NCLB, try to destroy public schools?

4. Why would California's Democrat governor and Democrat legislature agree to NCLB? Let's not forget, it's optional (except for losing federal education dollars).

5. Is it not at all possible that accountability for federal dollars can be seen by some as a good thing, without having any other nefarious motives?

For her beliefs to be true, the 87 members of the US Senate who voted for the law--including Senators Boxer, Feinstein, Kennedy, Clinton, Kerry, Edwards, Reid, and Byrd--would either have to have agreed with the plan to get rid of public education, or would have had to have had the wool pulled over their eyes as to its true intent. Neither speaks well for those senators. Only 10 Senators voted against (including two Republicans), and three did not vote. The law passed the House by a vote of 381-41-12, including a 'yes' vote by current-Speaker Pelosi.

Given that overwhelming support, I can't see how the purpose could possibly have been what my colleague believes.

The next argument from the lefties about NCLB is that it isn't "fully funded", whatever that means. My colleague can't possibly believe this is the problem, as more money won't get 100% of students to grade level.

Her next point is that the law requires state action for schools that don't achieve the 100% standard. What exactly does she think is going to happen when, as she believes, every school in the country will fail to meet the 100% standard? The states can't take over every school, and even if they did, that wouldn't spell the end of public education.

Her view is irrational and is based, in my opinion, on Bush Derangement Syndrome. She's sincere in her belief, but dead wrong.

At this point I'll grant that the 100% standard is unattainable. I'm hard pressed to name any standard that is achieved 100% of the time. I've said several times before, including on this blog, that I'd favor a plan more like California's, in which continuous improvement towards the 100% goal would be acceptable. I think California's improvement standard is very weak indeed and should be higher, but it's the right idea. I would like it if the Congress, which now is in the process of "reauthorizing" the No Child Left Behind Act, made such a change. There are some other modifications that could be made that would satisfy me even more, but for the most part I agree with the concept.

Some wonder how I can call myself a conservative and support this law. It's not that hard. As I've said before, my support is based more on Realpolitik than on ideological purity--federal education money isn't going away, so if we're going to spend it anyway, I'd like to know that it's having some positive impact.

That view doesn't seem so far out of the mainstream to me.

Update, 3/14/07: My colleague isn't the only one who believes in the conspiracy. Also, the question of 100% proficiency is raised. You heard it here first! =)

Update 3/15/07: The conspiracy theory folds.

[I]t's silly to think there was a conservative conspiracy to use NCLB to destroy public education because most conservatives didn't support NCLB in the first place.

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Here We Go Again With The Vagina Monologues

It's mid-winter, which means it's time for another story about the Vagina Monologues. I think I was able to get through 2006 without devoting a post to it, but 2005 had a good one.

This year's story, from New York state, involves three girls who were told in advance not to use the word "vagina" when quoting from the Vagina Monologues at a high school event sponsored by a literary magazine. They used the word, got suspended, and all hell broke loose.

Yes, it's just a word. Let's see what I had to say about it back in 2005, shall we?

Should girls at school really be wearing "I heart my vagina" t-shirts or pins? If so, what would truly be wrong with boys wearing "I heart your vagina, too" t-shirts? The girls are not being "empowered", they're objectifying themselves--something they'll then complain about.


I can't talk about your vagina or my penis in school without possibly losing my job, losing my teaching credential, and facing a sexual harassment claim. Why should the girls get away with it? Either a word is acceptable for everyone to say, or it's not. In this regard I'm reminded of the word "nigger"--either it's ok for all of us to say, or it's ok for none of us to say. We can't have dividing lines about who gets to use which words.

Some things are not appropriate for public discussion, and this is one of them. As I said before:

I'm not convinced that the vagina pins and shirts are appropriate for wear in public, much less at school. Notice I said appropriate, not legal. And given sexual harassment laws, which often criminalize the slightest language, word, or contact, isn't a pin glorifying your vagina crossing the line? I think that schools could reasonably assume that shirts/pins which discuss sex organs would be disruptive--but more than that, they contribute to incivility... Is it too much to ask that we try to create a reasonably civil atmosphere at our public schools?


The fact that the girls' parents are "supporting" them just shows how far we've gone from a civic spirit to a selfish one. To paraphrase, Have you no decency, ma'am?

Update, 3/14/07: The principal has his say. Then he's overruled. Pathetic.

Walter Reed = Socialized Medicine

As it was in the Great Britain,
Is now and ever shall be.

I quote now from Instapundit (see blogroll at left), who quotes Ron Bailey:

RON BAILEY:

You Wonder What Universal Government Health Care Might Look Like....

Well, look no further than the scandalous mess at Walter Reed Army Hospital. Crappy hospitals, endless waits, mountains of paperwork and, at the end of the day, no real accountability from the people who run the joint. Folks, if the government can't or won't take good care of our injured soldiers, what makes you think that it will take good care of little Sally or Uncle Bill?

Health care in the United States is screwed up. This is largely due to bad government policies, e.g., third party payment encouraged through the tax code and multiplying state insurance mandates that unnecessarily boost costs. As the example of Walter Reed is warning us, putting total control of all health care in the hands of those who wrecked it in first place--Congress, states and federal agencies--is the wrong way to go. (Boldface mine--Darren)

Indeed.

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

How I Deal With Daylight Savings Time

I dread this coming weekend. Missing that hour of sleep, and resetting my internal chronometer and circadian rhythms, get more and more difficult the older I get.

But I've found a method that helps with the transition.

I don't do it all at once--notice that word transition.

Starting with the Monday before the change, I set my alarm clock 10 minutes earlier each day. I don't actually get out of bed, I just let the alarm clock wake me. On Friday, when I'm waking up almost an hour before I normally would, I might even attempt to go back to sleep--but at least I've awakened early. By the time Sunday rolls around, waking up early is old hat--and it's so much easier to adjust 10 minutes at a time than it is to jump into the entire hour at once.

Try it and see! There's still plenty of time left.

And now, good night!

Carnival of Education

This week's very-well-done Carnival is hosted over at What It's Like on the Inside.

I Guess They Learned By Watching The Farm Animals

This blog post, with a link to this TV news report, was sent to me by one of my students. Eek.

13 Investigates was tipped off by a disturbed resident who writes

"...during school hours in a classroom with an experienced teacher present, two sixth graders completed the act of intercourse...at least ten students were witnesses. No disciplinary actions were taken against the teacher... All teachers were told to keep quiet."

Middle school students having sex in a busy classroom while a teacher is present? Warren Township Associate Superintendent Jeff Swensson confirmed it's true. It's been kept under wraps since November.


Only later in the report, after we've been given all the titillating details, do we learn this somewhat mitigating fact:

Associate Superintendent Jeff Swensson told Eyewitness News off camera the teacher didn't know what was going on because another student acted as a "look-out." But once the teacher discovered the behavior, immediate action was taken.


The report mentions that this was in a "lab" class, and a comment on the blog indicates that it occurred in a shop class, so it's slightly more understandable than if the event had occurred in, say, a math class. So what was at first blush (pardon the pun) presented as "Look what kids in school are doing! Where was the teacher?!" is in reality more of a "Look how disgusting those kids are." Quite a different tack, don't you think?

Funny how those actions of teachers can look a little different when one gets past the shocking headline and the teaser--not that I have any experience in that matter or anything.

If the pre-teen sex isn't enough to get your goat (again, pardon the pun), the fact that the school/district tried to hush it up should certainly be getting some people's attention.

Thanks for sending that to me, Rob.

RightWingProf's Tips For New Teachers

Some of these I can agree with, and others I cannot, but overall it's a pretty good primer.

I'm sure some will ask which ones I agree with, and which ones I do not. OK, here goes.

Agree:

  • Never forget that you don't teach in a vacuum.
  • Be skeptical of everything you heard in ed school.
  • Go find a good, experienced teacher, and ask him for advice.
  • Grade as objectively as possible.
  • Assess your students' performance frequently.
  • Critique yourself--harshly.
  • Classes gel as entities.
  • Treat your students with respect.
  • Be an authority figure--and set an example.

Disagree:

  • Stick to your topic. While that's generally good advice, it sometimes conflicts with the very first piece of advice he offered--that of remembering that you don't teach in a vacuum.
  • Your students are paramount. Again, generally good advice, but not always. As I tell parents on Back To School Night, my own son comes first, their kid comes second. I think they understand why it has to be that way.

The Left *Really* Hates Fox News

I've linked before to reports and studies that show that Fox News actually is more fair and balanced than are its major network competitors--but when you're a leftie, being balanced and not toeing the leftie line makes Fox a rightwing organization. And the lefties really don't like that. They've enjoyed their monopoly on the news for too long. How else do you explain these comments, in a story about Fox' upcoming coverage of a Democratic debate in Reno on August 14th?

MoveOn.org spokesman Adam Green is quite insistent. “The Democrats,” he says, “realize they made a mistake legitimizing Fox News. It’s not really a legitimate news outlet.” …

As it happens, MoveOn has a fallback, compromise position. “No Fox News (in the broadcast picture on the debate) “unless it is balanced by a left wing outlet.” Their idea is to have the struggling Air America radio network co-host and air the debate on the radio.

I asked Green what he thinks of his counterparts on the right’s view that there are major legitimate news outlets that are liberal to left in their political bent. But he was having none of it. What about the New York Times?

“The New York Times is not a liberal newspaper,” he said, repeating that Fox News doesn’t do any real journalism.

Isn’t this a matter of free speech for a news organization to also have a point of view?

“It is not a matter of free speech,” Green insisted. “It is a matter of fact not opinion that Fox does not do news.”

Am I the only person to whom that sounds rather extreme? The largest single news audience, and they're not a legitimate news organization?

And remember, these may be the words of one leftie. But MoveOn.org isn't some fly-by-night organization, they're a strong movement on the left and the Democrats listen to them. And if you're a leftie, tell me that you don't agree with this guy Green.

Greenwald laid out his view of Fox and its pernicious coverage. “They mix them up — commentators and news anchors very carefully — you can’t tell them apart.”

“You can watch for a week,” he claimed, “and not be able to tell the difference between a commentator and a news host.”

Greenwald evidently does not watch Fox News much, because it is not hard to tell the difference between Sean Hannity and Brit Hume, as I pointed out. To which he said: “Ultimately it doesn’t matter because the station is committed to a point of view.”

Which is true as well of, say, the New York Times.

“They don’t do objective news,” Greenwald insisted about Fox.

Lefties. Can't live with 'em, can't shoot 'em. =)

Update, 3/10/07: Looks like the Democrats may have buckled.

By Friday, the Nevada Democratic Party caved in to the lunatic fringe and beganseeking a more "appropriate" television partner.


Update #2, 3/12/07: Neal Boortz has it right:

"If you want to be the President of the United States, you can't be afraid to deal with people with whom you disagree politically." If this is going to be how the Democrats operate, it's going to be a long 20 months.

This so-called right wing bias in the news coverage on Fox News is a complete joke. Last year I asked --- no I begged my listeners and Nuze readers to watch Fox News and present me with an example of right wing bias in their news coverage...We went through a whole year of this and not once could any liberal call the show, and not once did someone send us an email detailing a right-wing bias in Fox News Channel's news coverage.

The real problem the left has with Fox News is that it doesn't have a LIBERAL bias.


Sitting back now, watching the frothing at the mouth by the lefties =)

Update #3, 3/13/07: Harry Reid flip-flops on the issue.

Monday, March 05, 2007

Joanne's Book Now Available In Softcover

I received the following email from my blogmother, Joanne Jacobs (link at left), and am happy to help.

I’m asking bloggers to spread the word: My book, Our School: The Inspiring Story of Two Teachers, One Big Idea and the Charter School That Beat the Odds, is now available in paperback. March 6 is the official publication date.

Our School follows the principal, teachers and students at Downtown College Prep, a San Jose charter high school that turns underachievers -- most come from low-income Mexican immigrant families -- into serious students. The charter school’s educational philosophy is: Work your butt off. Students aren’t told they’re wonderful. Teachers tell them they’re capable of improving, which turns out to be true. All graduates in the first three classes have been admitted to college; 81 percent remain on track to earn a four-year degree.

Weird fact: The publisher insisted I take “charter” out of the subtitle for the hardcover; they put “charter” back in for the paperback. Apparently, charter schools are now fashionable.

Our School isn’t written for wonks. Readers tell me it’s a page-turner. The book received excellent reviews in the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, New York Post, Sacramento Bee and others.

The book is in some, but not all, book stores and is available through Amazon. (I’ve got the links on my blog, joannejacobs.com, and on ourschoolbook.com.)

With all the despair about educating "left behind" kids, I think people need to learn that it’s possible to make a difference.


I read the book cover to cover. It's easy to read, very entertaining, and thought-provoking--in other words, very well done all around. Talk about the Freedom Writers movie is making the rounds in education circles; this book is at least as worthy.

Governor Schwarzenegger's Education Policy

...or lack thereof.

The job's (Secretary of Education) been vacant since Dec. 15, when Alan Bersin left after barely more than 16 months. Three able people have been asked or sounded out about replacing him; none was interested because, as one education official put it, "it's a crappy job." Although California spends nearly half its budget on education, the governor seems barely interested in how it's spent or in education policy generally.


We have an Acting Secretary of Education, Scott Himelstein. I've met him, and while I haven't seen into his soul, he struck me as a good man with a command of both education and politics.

This opinion piece from the major Sacramento newspaper continues:

That (lack of collective knowledge of education policy) has led to a series of blunders in recent years, the most obvious being last year's act by the Legislature to punish the State Board of Education -- the governor's board -- by cutting all funding for its staff.

When the blunders get serious enough, as they did when the whole state accountability system was under attack, also last year, and two former governors issued a public warning to Schwarzenegger, he parachutes in with reassurances. Something similar happened in 2004 when the staff director of the State Board of Education resigned and two members of the board threatened to quit.

But there seems to be no strong capacity in the governor's shop to track or develop expertise in long-term education policy issues.


After a lengthy diversion about a series of soon-to-be-released studies about school financing, the article concludes:

That brings us back to the question of leadership. California badly needs the capacity in the governor's office to oversee what will almost necessarily have to be increased spending on schools and protect California's high academic standards. But that will require both the people to do the job and, more important, the interest.


I'm not convinced that the governor demonstrates a lack of interest in education, but neither does education seem to merit as much of his attention as something that consumes half the state budget should garner. He was no doubt bruised by the November 2005 special election, which also gave a boost to the California Teachers Association, one of several unions that fought against the governor's initiatives. That, however, explains, but doesn't excuse, the governor's apparent lack of involvement.

What is it, you might wonder, that I expect of the governor? First, he has stated that he supports California's high academic standards; I expect that he'll continue to nominate exceptional people (Reed Hastings, for example) to the State Board of Education. Second, I expect him to be a vigorous supporter of the state content standards, and to shame anyone that dares try to weaken them (Jackie Goldberg) as not doing what's best for children. Additionally, he should be proactive about these, not wait until an issue arises before he gets involved. Governor Schwarzenegger needs to lead from the front, to identify his educational agenda publicly and push to have it enacted. I honestly don't know what the governor's education agenda is, although I'm sure I could find it with a few minutes on a search engine.

But that's just the point, isn't it? I'm a teacher, in a school not a dozen miles from the governor's office in the Capitol. If anyone not in the governor's circle should know what his agenda is, I should. But I don't.

What we have here is a failure to communicate. At least, I hope that's the failure, and not a lack of interest.