Monday, April 01, 2019

Racist Teachers?

Are there disparities in school discipline between races?  Absolutely.

The fun part comes in determining the reason(s) for such disparities.  Is it because school staff are racist?  Or are there disparities in behavior between students of different races or ethnic groups?

Let's take a look at some new information coming out of Washington State:
When examining school discipline disparities, data consistently show that Asian-American students, compared to other racial and ethnic groups, have the lowest rates of suspensions and expulsions.

But educators and researchers have long said the numbers don’t paint an accurate picture of what many students who fall within the Asian category experience in school because the classification itself is such a gross generalization of the many ethnicities and nationalities in that category, which makes up nearly half the world’s population.

It is against this backdrop that a team of researchers from UCLA, the University of Washington and Lewis & Clark College in Oregon released findings this month showing that discipline outcomes varied considerably among Asian and Pacific Islander subgroups. Students from Southeast Asian countries, like Vietnam and Cambodia, had suspension and expulsion rates that were 2 to 3 times higher than those from China, Japan and other East Asian countries, according to the study.

The study also found that rates for Pacific Islander subgroups — which include students from Hawaii, Guam, Samoa and other Pacific islands — were significantly higher than any of the Asian subgroups. The research focused on Washington state because it is the only state that requires schools to break out data by Asian and Pacific Islander subgroups. California schools report Pacific Islanders separate from Asians but do not report Pacific Islander subgroups...
As stated on Instapundit this morning:
For example, it finds that ethnic Cambodian and Vietnamese students are suspended or expelled at rates 2 to 3 times that of ethnic Chinese students. The differences between Pacific Islander and Chinese students were even greater. Samoan students were suspended or expelled at more than 10 times the rate of Chinese students, and Guamanian/Chamorro students at almost 5 times the rate of Chinese students.

Does anyone believe that Washington State teachers are twice as biased against Samoan students as they are against Guamanian/Chamorro students? I doubt it. The real reasons for these differences are a good deal more complicated than that (and they are connected to differences in behavior).
Back to the EdSource article:
Noguera and his co-authors concluded that in some respects the discipline gap and the achievement gap — which refers to disparities among racial and ethnic groups in various measures of student success, like standardized tests and graduation rates — are “two sides of the same coin.” The argument being that the same factors that contribute to the achievement gap — high rates of neighborhood poverty and schools with few resources — lead to the discipline gap.

However, they ultimately found that a clear correlation can’t be made without more robust research. It’s even more difficult to gain insight into the relationship when it comes to Asian and Pacific Islander students because of the lack of data and almost non-existent research, the authors of the current study said.
I've been saying for years that the known disparities are  the result of culture, not of racism.  Yet, even the teachers unions side with the racism argument, throwing their members under the bus in the process of proving their "woke" bona fides.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

In the 50s, I grew up in a small town where most people were poor. Many depended on fishing, hunting, foraging and home gardens to help feed their families. However, essentially all kids grew up in intact families (widowhood aside, which is statistically very different from single parenhood in terms of outcomes) who socialized their kids appropriately. There was no crime and we had no police. The school building was decently maintained, but books were old (but of higher academic quality than today’s) and other resources were very basic - a poor school by today’s definition. However, like previous generations, all kids finished eigth grade with solid literacy, numeracy and general knowledge across the disciplines; including art/architecture/music history/appreciation - from regular classroom teachers (grades 1-4 were Normal School grads; no college). It would be great progress if all of today’s HS grads did as well. Poverty is NOT the problem; the problem is the array of habits, beliefs, behaviors and practices that create the culture which enables and perpetuates poverty.