The law professor author of
this piece laments that he has to "uneducate" his current students from the illiberal illogic our society and their education has given them and teach them to use their brains and not their feelz:
First, except when describing an ideology, you are not to use a word
that ends in “ism.” Communism, socialism, Nazism, and capitalism are
established concepts in history and the social sciences, and those terms
can often be used fruitfully to gain knowledge and promote
understanding. “Classism,” “sexism,” “materialism,” “cisgenderism,” and
(yes) even racism are generally not used as meaningful or productive
terms, at least as you have been taught to use them. Most of the time,
they do not promote understanding.
In
fact, “isms” prevent you from learning. You have been taught to slap an
“ism” on things that you do not understand, or that make you feel
uncomfortable, or that make you uncomfortable because you do not
understand them. But slapping a label on the box without first opening
the box and examining its contents is a form of cheating. Worse, it
prevents you from discovering the treasures hidden inside the box. For
example, when we discussed the Code of Hammurabi, some of you wanted to
slap labels on what you read which enabled you to convince yourself that
you had nothing to learn from ancient Babylonians. But when we peeled
off the labels and looked carefully inside the box, we discovered
several surprising truths. In fact, we discovered that Hammurabi still
has a lot to teach us today.
One of the falsehoods that has been stuffed into your brain and pounded
into place is that moral knowledge progresses inevitably, such that
later generations are morally and intellectually superior to earlier
generations, and that the older the source the more morally suspect that
source is. There is a term for that. It is called chronological
snobbery. Or, to use a term that you might understand more easily,
“ageism."
Second, you have been taught to resort to two moral values above all
others, diversity and equality. These are important values if properly
understood. But the way most of you have been taught to understand them
makes you irrational, unreasoning...
So he's made a few rules to amplify his explanations:
1. The only “ism” I ever want to come out your mouth is a syllogism.
If I catch you using an “ism” or its analogous “ist” — racist,
classist, etc. — then you will not be permitted to continue speaking
until you have first identified which “ism” you are guilty of at that
very moment. You are not allowed to fault others for being biased or
privileged until you have first identified and examined your own biases
and privileges.
2. If I catch you this semester using the words “fair,”
“diversity,” or “equality,” or a variation on those terms, and you do
not stop immediately to explain what you mean, you will lose your
privilege to express any further opinions in class until you first
demonstrate that you understand three things about the view that you are
criticizing.
3. If you ever begin a statement with the words “I feel,” before
continuing you must cluck like a chicken or make some other suitable
animal sound.
I wish more people thought this way.
No comments:
Post a Comment