If the theory of man-made global warming were such a self-obvious truth, the result of scientific consensus, then why do advocates for this idea keep committing frauds to advance it? Even more disturbing, why are some writers willing to defend this behavior?
Saturday, March 03, 2012
Lying To Save The Earth
I cannot argue with this:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Darren
You've had this up all weekend and the usual suspects have not rushed to the defense of "global cooling", err "global warming", oh, yea, climate change. I wonder what's up with that? We both know they read this blog regularly.
One has a really good excuse for not addressing it this weekend.
I'm going to be a tedious nit-picker; it's a theory after experimental/observational evidence is collected that verifies the hypothesis. Since there's no experimental/observational evidence that verifies anthropogenic global warming it's still a hypothesis.
Post a Comment