Sunday, May 06, 2012

The High Cost of Affirmative Action

So-called reverse discrimination is a high enough cost, penalizing innocent students merely because people with their same skin color, a long time ago, did things of which we today are rightly not proud.  A utilitarian could conceivably argue, though, that at least the recipient of affirmative action wins out--but that might not be the case, either:
A major study, led by Rutgers-Newark psychology professor Kent D. Harber, indicates that public school teachers under-challenge minority students by providing them more positive feedback than they give to white students, for work of equal merit. The study, which is currently available online in the Journal of Educational Psychology (JEP), involved 113 white middle school and high school teachers in two public school districts located in the New York/New Jersey/Connecticut tri-state area, one middle class and white, and the other more working class and racially mixed.

Teachers read and commented on a poorly written essay which they believed was composed by a student in a writing class. Some teachers thought the student was black, some thought the student was Latino, and some thought that the student was white. Teachers believed that their feedback would be sent directly to the student, in order to see how the student would benefit from their comments and advice.

In fact, there was no actual student, and the poorly written essay was developed by Harber and his team. The real purpose was to see how teachers would respond to subpar work due to the race of the student who composed it. As Harber and his team predicted, the teachers displayed a "positive feedback bias," providing more praise and less criticism if they thought the essay was written by a minority student than by a white student.
But we need to encourage the poor babies, say the paternalists among us. Does it work?
"The social implications of these results are important; many minority students might not be getting input from instructors that stimulates intellectual growth and fosters achievement," notes Harber. "Some education scholars believe that minorities under-perform because they are insufficiently challenged -- the 'bigotry of lowered expectations,' in popular parlance," he explains. "The JEP study indicates one important way that this insufficient challenge might occur: in positively biased feedback," according to Harber.
When you set the bar low, people don't jump high.

1 comment:

allen (in Michigan) said...

Be nice if some enterprising journalist dug into what becomes of affirmative action students.

The information's surprisingly hard to find which is understandable. Since even successful graduates are now showing up with staggering amounts of student debt it's a cinch affirmative action students, who wash out, unsurprisingly, at a higher rate then non-affirmative action students end up with the debt, no degree and probably a well-earned attitude problem.