A ballot measure submitted by a political consultant for education advocate Michelle Rhee seeks to remove seniority as a factor when California school districts lay off teachers, requiring instead that decisions be based on performance and student test scores.It's not that I'm against the idea, I just don't see how it will work. Under the new testing regime with the Common Core standards, I understand that students will only be tested a few times throughout their K-12 experience. In high school they'll be tested in the 11th grade. Given that, how do you determine who the lousy teacher(s) is (are) and ditch them if there are to be layoffs?
That approach has been at the core of Rhee’s advocacy efforts as head of StudentsFirst, a national group headquartered in Sacramento. Rhee, who is married to Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, has said she established the group to try to counter the influence that teachers unions have in decisions about public education. Unions generally reject the idea that teachers should be rated based on their students’ test scores, and prefer contracts that call for the most recently hired teachers to be the first let go during layoffs.
I don't like ideological solutions to problems, I like practical ones. Yes, it turns out that I often see practicality in solutions that conform to my ideology, but definitely not in this case. I'd want to see how this would work in practice before I'd support it.