But very surprising to some at UC was this: The regents' decision flouted a unanimous faculty senate vote a few weeks earlier to retain the SAT for now -- after a year-long study by a task force commissioned by Napolitano herself found the test neither “racist” nor discriminatory nor an obstacle to minorities in any way.
The 228-page report, loaded with hundreds of displays of data from the UC's various admissions departments, found that the SAT and a commonly used alternative test, ACT -- also eliminated – actually helped increase black, Hispanic, and Native American enrollment at the system's 10 campuses, and recommended that their use be continued.
“To sum up,” the task force report determined, “the SAT allows many disadvantaged students to gain guaranteed admission to UC.”
The contradictory, lopsided votes raised the question: How could the liberal governing board of a major university system reject the imprimatur of its own liberal faculty researchers and kill a diversity accelerator in the name of the very diversity desired?
The answer, according to numerous interviews with people concerned, is that the urgency of political momentum against the tests -- reflecting a wider national mood of racial grievance -- proved irresistible and swept away the research and data.
Much like the Roman Empire--why have a senate if you just ignore it?
It's all a big Woke Clown Show, apparently.
ReplyDeleteYeah, we'll just make those big bad SAT and ACT scores blow away in the wind, and invite all those deserving youth finally hurdle past racism into higher education.
But wait...what's this? They are admitted but NOT PASSING or GRADUATING?
They can't do the work which the SAT or ACT were meant to test for?
Why...this can't be!
Time to double down and reduce the work!