Wednesday, June 17, 2020

There Was, And Is, No Need For Lockdowns

I didn't like it, but I went along with it in March because we were told that, in essence, the next Bubonic Plague was among us.  Time went on and we learned more, and soon it was obvious that the lockdowns were not only unnecessary but excessive.  The numbers tell the story, and here are the numbers from Canada:
Was confining much of the working-age population the right decision?

According to Public Health Agency of Canada data, there had been 7,773 Covid-19 deaths in Canada as of June 7. Federal Chief Medical Officer Theresa Tam has confirmed that 81 percent of them were linked to long-term care facilities. Of the remaining 1,482 deaths, most were people over the age of 70. Only 229 of the total deaths were aged under 60 and almost all of those had pre-existing health conditions. Clearly, for a healthy working-age person, the risk of dying from Covid-19 is significantly lower than dying by accident or from other diseases.

If Canada’s working-age people hadn’t been removed from the workforce plus been subjected to such severe general restrictions – everything from being barred from medical and personal care appointments, to cancelling travel and being unable to go about their daily lives, nearly all of which involves economic activity of one sort or another – Canada’s economy would have continued to function without the job losses, bankruptcies and tragic social impacts including mental health deterioration, suicides and family violence. And without the need for the crippling increases in our national debt. In hindsight, keeping healthy working-age people away from their jobs – the first such quarantine ever undertaken – may be the most damaging decision in Canadian history.

Knowing what we know about nursing home deaths in this country, it's hard not to see the parallel.  Yet, the US-Canadian border continues to be closed, and the closure extended until at least July 21st.  This is insane.  It also highlights Canada's socialized medicine problem:
Did the shutdown of surgical wards to prepare for Covid-19 victims cost more lives than were saved?

These shutdowns came as Canadians in need of health care were already suffering on long waiting lists. A December 2019 Fraser Institute report found that waiting lists averaged 20 weeks and totalled more than 1 million people. Cancer, cardiac and other patients who had finally been given a surgical date were sent notices of indefinite postponement. The mental anguish of knowing that a tumour continues to grow or a blocked artery might cause a heart attack adds even further medical risk. Now, three months later, no one knows how much longer their wait will be. B.C., for example, has announced that it will take as long as two years to work through its 30,000 cancelled surgeries. Ironically, B.C. Health Minister Adrian Dix has now turned for help to the same private clinics he’s been trying to shut down.

Preparing for the possibility that hospitals could become overwhelmed by Covid-19 victims was a prudent decision. The problem is that our medical system went into the crisis with essentially zero unused capacity and the longest waiting lists in the OECD.
A Canadian said it, not me--the longest waiting lists in the OECD.

And what does this Canadian say about schools?
Open the secondary schools. There have been zero deaths of children under age 16 in Canada. And there’s a growing consensus that their light viral load makes children unlikely spreaders of the virus. Rather than being the most vulnerable, as they were to the Spanish Flu a century ago, they appear to be the least vulnerable to Covid-19. Reopening schools therefore poses low risks. When summer ends, many parents need to get back to work, rather being kept home supervising their children.
And the best suggestion of all:
Don’t leave pandemic response measures solely in the hands of Chief Medical Officers. They did their job of “flattening the curve” well. But the measures taken should have also considered the impact of hospital bed closures on treatment of other diseases, small business owners who face losing everything, stress-induced mental health deterioration, suicides, family violence, long-term unemployment and massive public debt.

The strategy to cope with any new outbreak should include our best financial, business, education and mental health experts working as a team. These teams should be assembled immediately as we navigate the unknown course of the corona virus. There’s little point to sweeping measures that over-protect the entire population against a single virus if the resulting damage is so severe that the nation in its weakened state can’t cope with future crises, whether those are health-related or otherwise. For such crises will surely occur.

Hear hear.

2 comments:

  1. Comrade, shut the f%^& up before we are both sent to the reeducation camps! :<)

    ReplyDelete
  2. All this. A friend of mine is an RN with years of surgical experience. Her doctor's office just reopened since being closed mid March. During that time she was working part time in the COVID wards until they too didn't need extra staff. What's happening now is that all the doctors beyond pulmonologists, virologists, and other disciplines applying directly to COVID are working overtime, oncologists, dermatologists, chiropractors and other medical disciplines are closed. A neighbor of mine has a lump on her breast and hasn't been able to get a mammogram since February. She's terrified that it's gotten worse. But the reality is they just shut down secondary medical procedures which includes biopsies. How many will die as a result of this? A good friend of my husband's died at the age of 54 of an undiagnosed pulmonary embolism for which he had all the symptoms, but no doctor would see him. It's simply sick.

    ReplyDelete