California is not on track to meet its greenhouse gas emission goals, in part because Californians just aren’t ready to give up their trucks and SUVs.I haven't looked up the political leanings of Next 10 or Beacon Economics, does anyone want to take a guess before doing so?
A new study by nonprofit group Next 10 and Beacon Economics found Californians in late 2018 owned more gas-guzzling [boldface mine--Darren] pickups, mini-vans and SUVs than they did five years ago. Those vehicles made up 57.3 percent of new vehicle registrations in 2018, compared to 39.3 percent in 2013.
The wildfires that scorched California in 2017 and 2018 were another setback, pumping tens of millions of tons of carbon into the atmosphere and offsetting the state’s efforts to curtail man-made greenhouse gas emissions.
The new report from Next 10 and Beacon Economics shows that the Golden State is unlikely to reach its carbon reduction goals for 2030 and 2050 at the current rate of progression. A law signed by former Gov. Jerry Brown in 2016 sets a target of cutting the state’s greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030.
“Assuming the same rate of reduction from 2016 to 2017, California will reach its 2030 and 2050 goals in 2061 and 2157, respectively — representing a 31-year and a 107-year delay,” according to the report.
The report comes as California is locked in a dispute with President Donald Trump about the state’s legal authority to impose stricter air pollution standards on vehicles. The California Air Resources Board has used that power to negotiate pacts with carmakers committing them to producing fuel-efficient vehicles that average 50 miles per gallon of gas.
Anyway, here's my view on their findings:
To paraphrase Justin Bieber, Next 10 and Beacon Economics can suck it.
I would like to ask these geniuses if they figured out what would happen if we sucked all the CO2 out of the atmosphere?
ReplyDeleteIf you want an interesting take on climate change, read what Freakonomics has to say.
ReplyDelete