Environmentalism and the Skeptical Mind, Part 5

I've plagiarized enough information in the previous 4 posts that I thought it necessary to identify my source materials. Here they are, in no discernible order:

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/kyoto/kyotorpt.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4267245.stm

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0216/p09s02-coop.html
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,12260770%255E31478,00.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1502076.stm
http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110002949
http://www.techcentralstation.com/082803D.html
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,9667935%255E75
83,00.html
http://www.lomborg.com/books.htm
http://www.techcentralstation.com/021004C.html
http://www.taemag.com/issues/articleid.17889/article_detail.asp
http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthtribune/news/nation/3481057.htm
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.03/moore.html
http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/131
http://www.libertymatters.org/newsservice/2004/faxback/2778_Greenpeace.htm
http://www.undueinfluence.com/greenpeace.htm
http://www.greenspirit.com/index.cfm

As you can see, these posts weren't based on entirely scholarly materials.  But that wasn't the point.  The point was to present information, offer quotes--and let you decide for yourself.